| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I53a962c9a301089c8aed0b43c50f944c30225944
Signed-off-by: venkata edara <redara@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16653
Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Swift's object expirer in kilo series was incompatible with
gluster-swift. This change does the following:
* Optimizes crawl in account and container server for listing
requests for containers and tracker objects in gsexpiring volume.
* Enables container server to delete tracker objects from gsexpiring
volume. Swift's expirer sends request directly to container server
to remove tracker object entry.
* delete_tracker_object() is now a common utility function that is
invoked from container server and gluster-swift's object expirer.
* Run functional test to be run against both swift's object expirer
and gluster-swift's object expirer
Change-Id: Ib5b7f7f08fe7dda574f6dd80be2f38bdfaee32bc
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14038
Reviewed-by: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
This change re-introduces object expiration feature with some internal
differences from earlier implementation such as:
* Creation of zero-byte tracker object is performed directly on the
mount point. Earlier HTTP request was sent to object server
for the same. This incurred overhead of metadata creation for
these zero-byte files which isn't necessarry as all required
information is encoded in the path itself.
* Crawling of zero-byte tracker objects is done by the object
expirer daemon itself and not container server.
* Deletion of tracker object is performed by the object expiration daemon
directly on mount point.
Deletion of actual data object is not carried out by object expiration
daemon directly. The object expirer sends a DELETE request to object
server which deletes the actual object. This behaviour is not changed.
There is no change in behaviour in comparison with older implementation.
This is asserted by re-enabling existing functional tests without
any changes.
Change-Id: I01dc77cc4db3be3147d54e3aa2a19ed182498900
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13913
Reviewed-by: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thiago da Silva <thiago@redhat.com>
|
