summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShehjar Tikoo <shehjart@gluster.com>2009-05-19 12:42:22 +0000
committerAnand V. Avati <avati@dev.gluster.com>2009-05-20 11:44:49 -0700
commit693e4f912b618d35b85fe6521d87fb7f683421d0 (patch)
tree329e46f462e04ff8cbba9304b9816fe79d8c5a49 /xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
parent62a920642a54eac6e4b24a3590f17d628202a210 (diff)
io-threads: Change mutexes/condvars to spinlocks/semaphores
It seems that use of mutexes is resulting in pretty high thread sleep and wake-up cost. What is worse, if a worker thread has acquired a lock, there is a possibility of the main glusterfs thread being put to sleep. We change the use of mutexes into spinlock. At the same time, we cannot anymore use condvars for notification since the condvar interface depends on mutexes itself. Semaphores come to out rescue. Luckily, even the pthread semaphores have a timedwait interface to allow our idle worker threads to make an exit decision. Further, it is possible that spinlocks are not available on all systems so all this is curtained behind #defines so we can fall back to mutexes and condvars implementation. Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati <avati@dev.gluster.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c')
-rw-r--r--xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c106
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c b/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
index a0d5d97df..a04f664e8 100644
--- a/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
+++ b/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <time.h>
+#include "locking.h"
typedef void *(*iot_worker_fn)(void*);
@@ -62,6 +63,64 @@ iot_startup_worker (iot_worker_t *worker, iot_worker_fn workerfunc);
void
iot_destroy_request (iot_worker_t *worker, iot_request_t * req);
+void
+iot_notify_worker (iot_worker_t *worker)
+{
+#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCK
+ pthread_cond_broadcast (&worker->notifier);
+#else
+ sem_post (&worker->notifier);
+#endif
+
+ return;
+}
+
+int
+iot_notify_wait (iot_worker_t *worker, int idletime)
+{
+ struct timeval tv;
+ struct timespec ts;
+ int waitres = 0;
+
+ gettimeofday (&tv, NULL);
+ ts.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec + idletime;
+ /* Slightly skew the idle time for threads so that, we dont
+ * have all of them rushing to exit at the same time, if
+ * they've been idle.
+ */
+ ts.tv_nsec = skew_usec_idle_time (tv.tv_usec) * 1000;
+
+#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCK
+ waitres = pthread_cond_timedwait (&worker->notifier, &worker->qlock,
+ &ts);
+#else
+ UNLOCK (&worker->qlock);
+ errno = 0;
+ waitres = sem_timedwait (&worker->notifier, &ts);
+ LOCK (&worker->qlock);
+ if (waitres < 0)
+ waitres = errno;
+#endif
+
+ return waitres;
+}
+
+void
+iot_notify_init (iot_worker_t *worker)
+{
+ if (worker == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ LOCK_INIT (&worker->qlock);
+
+#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCK
+ pthread_cond_init (&worker->notifier, NULL);
+#else
+ sem_init (&worker->notifier, 0, 0);
+#endif
+
+ return;
+}
/* I know this function modularizes things a bit too much,
* but it is easier on the eyes to read this than see all that locking,
@@ -73,7 +132,7 @@ iot_request_queue_and_thread_fire (iot_worker_t *worker,
iot_worker_fn workerfunc, iot_request_t *req)
{
int ret = -1;
- pthread_mutex_lock (&worker->qlock);
+ LOCK (&worker->qlock);
{
if (iot_worker_active (worker)) {
_iot_queue (worker, req);
@@ -87,7 +146,7 @@ iot_request_queue_and_thread_fire (iot_worker_t *worker,
}
}
unlock:
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&worker->qlock);
+ UNLOCK (&worker->qlock);
return ret;
}
@@ -2229,7 +2288,7 @@ _iot_queue (iot_worker_t *worker, iot_request_t *req)
/* dq_cond */
worker->queue_size++;
- pthread_cond_broadcast (&worker->dq_cond);
+ iot_notify_worker(worker);
}
@@ -2300,8 +2359,6 @@ iot_ordered_exit (int cond_waitres, iot_worker_t *worker)
int
iot_ordered_request_wait (iot_worker_t * worker)
{
- struct timeval tv;
- struct timespec ts;
int waitres = 0;
int retstat = 0;
@@ -2310,15 +2367,7 @@ iot_ordered_request_wait (iot_worker_t * worker)
goto out;
}
- gettimeofday (&tv, NULL);
- ts.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec + worker->conf->o_idle_time;
- /* Slightly skew the idle time for threads so that, we dont
- * have all of them rushing to exit at the same time, if
- * they've been idle.
- */
- ts.tv_nsec = skew_usec_idle_time (tv.tv_usec) * 1000;
- waitres = pthread_cond_timedwait (&worker->dq_cond, &worker->qlock,
- &ts);
+ waitres = iot_notify_wait (worker, worker->conf->o_idle_time);
if (iot_ordered_exit (waitres, worker)) {
retstat = -1;
}
@@ -2335,7 +2384,7 @@ iot_dequeue_ordered (iot_worker_t *worker)
iot_request_t *req = NULL;
int waitstat = 0;
- pthread_mutex_lock (&worker->qlock);
+ LOCK (&worker->qlock);
{
while (!worker->queue_size) {
waitstat = 0;
@@ -2355,7 +2404,7 @@ iot_dequeue_ordered (iot_worker_t *worker)
worker->queue_size--;
}
out:
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&worker->qlock);
+ UNLOCK (&worker->qlock);
iot_destroy_request (worker, req);
return stub;
@@ -2425,8 +2474,6 @@ iot_unordered_exit (int cond_waitres, iot_worker_t *worker)
int
iot_unordered_request_wait (iot_worker_t * worker)
{
- struct timeval tv;
- struct timespec ts;
int waitres = 0;
int retstat = 0;
@@ -2435,15 +2482,7 @@ iot_unordered_request_wait (iot_worker_t * worker)
goto out;
}
- gettimeofday (&tv, NULL);
- ts.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec + worker->conf->u_idle_time;
- /* Slightly skew the idle time for threads so that, we dont
- * have all of them rushing to exit at the same time, if
- * they've been idle.
- */
- ts.tv_nsec = skew_usec_idle_time (tv.tv_usec) * 1000;
- waitres = pthread_cond_timedwait (&worker->dq_cond, &worker->qlock,
- &ts);
+ waitres = iot_notify_wait (worker, worker->conf->u_idle_time);
if (iot_unordered_exit (waitres, worker)) {
retstat = -1;
}
@@ -2460,7 +2499,7 @@ iot_dequeue_unordered (iot_worker_t *worker)
iot_request_t *req = NULL;
int waitstat = 0;
- pthread_mutex_lock (&worker->qlock);
+ LOCK (&worker->qlock);
{
while (!worker->queue_size) {
waitstat = 0;
@@ -2480,7 +2519,7 @@ iot_dequeue_unordered (iot_worker_t *worker)
worker->queue_size--;
}
out:
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&worker->qlock);
+ UNLOCK (&worker->qlock);
iot_destroy_request (worker, req);
return stub;
@@ -2560,8 +2599,7 @@ allocate_worker (iot_conf_t * conf)
INIT_LIST_HEAD (&wrk->rqlist);
wrk->conf = conf;
- pthread_cond_init (&wrk->dq_cond, NULL);
- pthread_mutex_init (&wrk->qlock, NULL);
+ iot_notify_init (wrk);
wrk->state = IOT_STATE_DEAD;
out:
@@ -2599,13 +2637,13 @@ out:
void
iot_stop_worker (iot_worker_t *worker)
{
- pthread_mutex_lock (&worker->qlock);
+ LOCK (&worker->qlock);
{
worker->state = IOT_STATE_EXIT_REQUEST;
}
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&worker->qlock);
+ UNLOCK (&worker->qlock);
- pthread_cond_broadcast (&worker->dq_cond);
+ iot_notify_worker (worker);
pthread_join (worker->thread, NULL);
}