From 24dd6ac9da2c22f95d00c82a52d19d475eab1a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavan Sondur Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 04:39:42 +0000 Subject: protocol/server: Use EBADFD instead of EBADF in the case of a failed fd resolution. Signed-off-by: Pavan Vilas Sondur Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati BUG: 952 (EBADF returned by server-protocol confuses AFR) URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=952 --- xlators/protocol/server/src/server-resolve.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xlators/protocol/server/src/server-resolve.c b/xlators/protocol/server/src/server-resolve.c index fc022be35..255223bb0 100644 --- a/xlators/protocol/server/src/server-resolve.c +++ b/xlators/protocol/server/src/server-resolve.c @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ server_resolve_fd (call_frame_t *frame) if (!state->fd) { resolve->op_ret = -1; - resolve->op_errno = EBADF; + resolve->op_errno = EBADFD; } server_resolve_all (frame); -- cgit