glusterfs-specs.git -

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Add feature page for sub-directory mounts.	Kaushal M	2016-03-18	1	-0/+122
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I395b2b60a7f0f9df0da14a70d21c89fa8016f7d7 Signed-off-by: Kaushal M <kshlmster@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13743 Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com> Tested-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
*	gluster-nfs-off: change default value of nfs.disable to true	Kaleb S KEITHLEY	2016-03-15	1	-0/+117
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Next step to eventually deprecate glusterfs nfs server in favor of ganesha.nfsd Change-Id: I1ec86457429b3a5f382125b38b24e2cb70e9871a Signed-off-by: Kaleb S KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13739 Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
*	Kerberos: clarify some details	Niels de Vos	2016-02-23	1	-5/+12
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Incorperate some more changes based on feedback from Simo Sorce. Change-Id: I5ebbfcfa25ee917f0457ccd83d1a5c54a7ece293 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13478 Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Tested-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
*	Move work-in-progress files to 'under_review'	Niels de Vos	2016-02-22	2	-0/+390
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The 'wip' and 'in_progress' directories are not defined. Files should be placed in the 'under_review' directory while they evolve. Change-Id: I4dd783a3b613e5d413c9738a145ec8f1086408ac CC: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com> CC: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com> CC: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> CC: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13479 Reviewed-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Tested-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
*	Rename in_progress to under_review	Kaushal M	2016-01-27	13	-0/+2268
	`in_progress` is vague term, which could either mean the feature review is in progress, or that the feature implementation is in progress. Renaming to `under_review` gives a much better indication that the feature is under review and implementation hasn't begun yet. Refer https://review.gluster.org/13187 for the discussion which lead to this Change-Id: I3f48e15deb4cf5486d7b8cac4a7915f9925f38f5 Signed-off-by: Kaushal M <kshlmster@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13264 Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com> Tested-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>