| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Incorperate some more changes based on feedback from Simo Sorce.
Change-Id: I5ebbfcfa25ee917f0457ccd83d1a5c54a7ece293
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13478
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The 'wip' and 'in_progress' directories are not defined. Files should be
placed in the 'under_review' directory while they evolve.
Change-Id: I4dd783a3b613e5d413c9738a145ec8f1086408ac
CC: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com>
CC: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com>
CC: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
CC: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13479
Reviewed-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
|
`in_progress` is vague term, which could either mean the feature
review is in progress, or that the feature implementation is in
progress.
Renaming to `under_review` gives a much better indication that the
feature is under review and implementation hasn't begun yet.
Refer https://review.gluster.org/13187 for the discussion which
lead to this
Change-Id: I3f48e15deb4cf5486d7b8cac4a7915f9925f38f5
Signed-off-by: Kaushal M <kshlmster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13264
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
|