Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Move work-in-progress files to 'under_review' | Niels de Vos | 2016-02-22 | 2 | -0/+390 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The 'wip' and 'in_progress' directories are not defined. Files should be placed in the 'under_review' directory while they evolve. Change-Id: I4dd783a3b613e5d413c9738a145ec8f1086408ac CC: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com> CC: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com> CC: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> CC: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13479 Reviewed-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> Tested-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com> | ||||
* | Rename in_progress to under_review | Kaushal M | 2016-01-27 | 13 | -0/+2268 |
`in_progress` is vague term, which could either mean the feature review is in progress, or that the feature implementation is in progress. Renaming to `under_review` gives a much better indication that the feature is under review and implementation hasn't begun yet. Refer https://review.gluster.org/13187 for the discussion which lead to this Change-Id: I3f48e15deb4cf5486d7b8cac4a7915f9925f38f5 Signed-off-by: Kaushal M <kshlmster@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13264 Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com> Tested-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com> |