There are many include statements that are not needed. A previous more ambitious attempt failed because of *BSD plafrom (see https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21929/ ) Now trying a more conservative reduction. It does not solve all circular deps that we have, but it does reduce some of them. There is just too much to handle reasonably (dht-common.h includes dht-lock.h which includes dht-common.h ...), but it does reduce the overall number of lines of include we need to look at in the future to understand and fix the mess later one. Change-Id: I550cd001bdefb8be0fe67632f783c0ef6bee3f9f updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>
Some interdependencies between logging and memory management functions make it impossible to use the logging framework before initializing memory subsystem because they both depend on Thread Local Storage allocated through pthread_key_create() during initialization. This causes a crash when we try to log something very early in the initialization phase. To prevent this, several dynamically allocated TLS structures have been replaced by static TLS reserved at compile time using '__thread' keyword. This also reduces the number of error sources, making initialization simpler. Updates: bz#1193929 Change-Id: I8ea2e072411e30790d50084b6b7e909c7bb01d50 Signed-off-by: Xavi Hernandez <xhernandez@redhat.com>
* libglusterfs changes to add new fop
* Fuse changes:
- Changes in fuse bridge xlator to receive and send responses
* posix changes to perform the op on the backend filesystem
* protocol and rpc changes for sending and receiving the fop
* gfapi changes for performing the fop
* tools: glfs-copy-file-range tool for testing copy_file_range fop
- Although, copy_file_range support has been added to the upstream
fuse kernel module, no release has been made yet of a kernel
which contains the support. It is expected to come in the
upcoming release of linux-4.20
So, as of now, executing copy_file_range fop on a fused based
filesystem results in fuse kernel module sending read on the
source fd and write on the destination fd.
Therefore a small gfapi based tool has been written to be able
test the copy_file_range fop. This tool is similar (in functionality)
to the example program given in copy_file_range man page.
So, running regular copy_file_range on a fuse mount point and
running gfapi based glfs-copy-file-range tool gives some idea about
how fast, the copy_file_range (or reflink) can be.
On the local machine this was the result obtained.
mount -t glusterfs workstation:new /mnt/glusterfs
[root@workstation ~]# cd /mnt/glusterfs/
[root@workstation glusterfs]# ls
file
[root@workstation glusterfs]# cd
[root@workstation ~]# time /tmp/a.out /mnt/glusterfs/file /mnt/glusterfs/new
real 0m6.495s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m1.439s
[root@workstation ~]# time glfs-copy-file-range $(hostname) new /tmp/glfs.log /file /rrr
OPEN_SRC: opening /file is success
OPEN_DST: opening /rrr is success
FSTAT_SRC: fstat on /rrr is success
copy_file_range successful
real 0m0.309s
user 0m0.039s
sys 0m0.017s
This tool needs following arguments
1) hostname
2) volume name
3) log file path
4) source file path (relative to the gluster volume root)
5) destination file path (relative to the gluster volume root)
"glfs-copy-file-range <hostname> <volume> <log file path> <source> <destination>"
- Added a testcase as well to run glfs-copy-file-range tool
* io-stats changes to capture the fop for profiling
* NOTE:
- Added conditional check to see whether the copy_file_range syscall
is available or not. If not, then return ENOSYS.
- Added conditional check for kernel minor version in fuse_kernel.h
and fuse-bridge while referring to copy_file_range. And the kernel
minor version is kept as it is. i.e. 24. Increment it in future
when there is a kernel release which contains the support for
copy_file_range fop in fuse kernel module.
* The document which contains a writeup on this enhancement can be found at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BSILbXr_knynNwxSyyu503JoTz5QFM_4suNIh2WwrSc/edit
Change-Id: I280069c814dd21ce6ec3be00a884fc24ab692367
updates: #536
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>
libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in general out of tree devel package usage. Towards this, the following changes are done, - moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory - Included these headers using system header notation <> in all code outside of libglusterfs - Included these headers using own program notation "" within libglusterfs This change although big, is just moving around the headers and making it correct when including these headers from other sources. This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without namespace conflicts. Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b Updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Change-Id: Ia84cc24c8924e6d22d02ac15f611c10e26db99b4 Signed-off-by: Nigel Babu <nigelb@redhat.com>
Right now there are two types of upcalls
* poll method
* registering callback
But callback can be registered per fs and same callback fn shall be used
for any lease recall with object handle as argument as done for cache
invalidation.
TODO: RECALL LEASE for each glfd (for future reference)
(may be needed fo Samba as they do not deal with
object handles.
In case of RECALL_LEASE, we could associate separate
cbk function for each glfd either by
- extending pub_glfs_lease to accept new args (recall_cbk_fn, cookie)
- or by defining new API "glfs_register_recall_cbk_fn (glfd, recall_cbk_fn, cookie)
. In such cases, flag it and instead of calling below upcall functions, define
a new one to go through the glfd list and invoke each of theirs recall_cbk_fn.
Plus added following as well
* passed lease id to dict in required arguments
* added flag check in pub_glfs_open
Updates: #350
Change-Id: I07a971f0f26ec6aae0b9f9a5613504317dee153b
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com>
* Introduce xlator methods to allow dumping of metrics * Separate options to get the metrics dumped in a path Updates #168 Change-Id: I7df80df33b71d6f449f03c2332665b4a45f6ddf2 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
icreate creates inode, while namelink links the basename to it's parent gfid. For now mkdir is the primary user of these fops. Better distribution is acheived by creating the inode on ,(say) mds1 and linking the basename to it's parent gfid on mds2. The inode serves readdirp, stat etc. More details about the fops are present at: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/13395/3/design/DHT2/DHT2_Icreate_Namelink_Notes.md This backport of three patches from experimental branch. 1- https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18085/ 2- https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18086/ 3- https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18094/ Updates gluster/glusterfs#243 Change-Id: I1bd3d5a441a3cfab1acfeb52f15c6c867d362592 Signed-off-by: Susant Palai <spalai@redhat.com>
Problem: It had been a longtime request to implement put fop in gluster. put fop in gluster may not have the exact sementics of HTTP PUT, but can be easily extended to do so. The subsequent patches, will contain more semantics on the put fop and its guarentees. Why compound fop framework is not used for put? Compound fop framework currently doesn't allow compounding of entry fop and inode fops, i.e. fops on multiple inodes cannot be combined in compound fop. Updates #353 Change-Id: Idb7891b3e056d46d570bb7e31bad1b6a28656ada Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
Coverity ID: 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443 Issue: Event include_recursion Removed redundant, recursive includes from the files. Change-Id: I920776b1fa089a2d4917ca722d0075a9239911a7 BUG: 789278 Signed-off-by: Girjesh Rajoria <grajoria@redhat.com>