libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using
include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better
especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in
general out of tree devel package usage.

Towards this, the following changes are done,
- moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory
- Included these headers using system header notation <> in all
code outside of libglusterfs
- Included these headers using own program notation "" within
libglusterfs

This change although big, is just moving around the headers and
making it correct when including these headers from other sources.

This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without
namespace conflicts.

Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b
Updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>

Post changing the max op-version to 4.2, after release
4.1 branching, the decision was to go with increasing
release numbers. Thus this needs to change to 5.0.

This commit addresses the above change.

Fixes: bz#1628664
Change-Id: Ifcc0c6da90fdd51e4eceea40749511110a432cce
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>

Change-Id: I6f5d8140a06f3c1b2d196849299f8d483028d33b

Updated the op-version on master to the next release
op-version, for any future options appearing on master.

Fixes: bz#1575742
Change-Id: I861d489573360e6679c6f5ffe127835ea71f2dda
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>

Right now there are two types of upcalls
* poll method
* registering callback

But callback can be registered per fs and same callback fn shall be used
for any lease recall with object handle as argument as done for cache
invalidation.

TODO: RECALL LEASE for each glfd (for future reference)
 (may be needed fo Samba as they do not deal with
  object handles.

    In case of RECALL_LEASE, we could associate separate
     cbk function for each glfd either by
       - extending pub_glfs_lease to accept new args (recall_cbk_fn, cookie)
       - or by defining new API "glfs_register_recall_cbk_fn (glfd, recall_cbk_fn, cookie)
       . In such cases, flag it and instead of calling below upcall functions, define
        a new one to go through the glfd list and invoke each of theirs recall_cbk_fn.

Plus added following as well
* passed lease id to dict in required arguments
* added flag check in pub_glfs_open

Updates: #350
Change-Id: I07a971f0f26ec6aae0b9f9a5613504317dee153b
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com>

For more details on this issue see
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308

Solution:
This is a restrictive solution where a file will not be migrated
if a client writes to it during the migration. This does not
check if the writes from the rebalance and the client actually
do overlap.

If dht_writev_cbk finds that the file is being migrated (PHASE1)
it will set an xattr on the destination file indicating the file
was updated by a non-rebalance client.
Rebalance checks if any other client has written to the dst file
and aborts the file migration if it finds the xattr.

updates gluster/glusterfs#308

Change-Id: I73aec28bc9dbb8da57c7425ec88c6b6af0fbc9dd
Signed-off-by: Susant Palai <spalai@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha@redhat.com>

Updated the op-version on master to the next release
op-version, for any future options appearing on master.

Change-Id: I2ef6f8874c638ade1d97477bdd8ffa1bd1a9f952
BUG: 1540338
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>

Problem:
In replica 3 volumes there is a possibilities of ending up in split
brain scenario, when multiple clients writing data on the same file
at non overlapping regions in parallel.

Scenario:
- Initially all the copies are good and all the clients gets the value
  of data readables as all good.
- Client C0 performs write W1 which fails on brick B0 and succeeds on
  other two bricks.
- C1 performs write W2 which fails on B1 and succeeds on other two bricks.
- C2 performs write W3 which fails on B2 and succeeds on other two bricks.
- All the 3 writes above happen in parallel and fall on different ranges
  so afr takes granular locks and all the writes are performed in parallel.
  Since each client had data-readables as good, it does not see
  file going into split-brain in the in_flight_split_brain check, hence
  performs the post-op marking the pending xattrs. Now all the bricks
  are being blamed by each other, ending up in split-brain.

Fix:
Have an option to take either full lock or range lock on files while
doing data transactions, to prevent the possibility of ending up in
split brains. With this change, by default the files will take full
lock while doing IO. If you want to make use of the old range lock
change the value of "cluster.full-lock" to "no".

Change-Id: I7893fa33005328ed63daa2f7c35eeed7c5218962
BUG: 1535438
Signed-off-by: karthik-us <ksubrahm@redhat.com>

This is the undisputed/trivial part of Shreyas' patch
he attached to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1364740 (of
which the current bug is a clone).

We need more evaluation for the page_size and window_size
bits before taking them on.

Change-Id: Iaa0b9a69d35e522b77a52a09acef47460e8ae3e9
BUG: 1428060
Co-authored-by: Shreyas Siravara <sshreyas@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Csaba Henk <csaba@redhat.com>

A new option is added to allow independent configuration of eager
locking for regular files and non-regular files.

Change-Id: I8f80e46d36d8551011132b15c0fac549b7fb1c60
BUG: 1502610
Signed-off-by: Xavier Hernandez <jahernan@redhat.com>