We have proposed about this an year ago, and with recent smoke failures, it looks like the right time to take such call. ref: https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-July/034400.html With this, glusterfs-8.0 wouldn't have rdma feature, and would allow some modularity changes possible with rpc layer (as we would have just 1 transport) Updates: bz#1635688 Change-Id: Ia277dca4d4b1f0cffae20819024a52b075b775e5 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
warning: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=] Change-Id: I69b8d47f0002c58b00d1cc947fac6f1c64e0b295 updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: SheetalPamecha <spamecha@redhat.com>
This reverts commit b87c397091bac6a4a6dec4e45a7671fad4a11770. There seems to be some performance regression with the patch and hence recommended to have it reverted. Updates: #325 Change-Id: Id85d6203173a44fad6cf51d39b3e96f37afcec09
used snprintf instead of sprintf and if the source string is bigger than destination then logged a warning message. clang warning: ‘%s’ directive writing up to 1024 bytes into a region of size 108. updates: bz#1622665 Change-Id: Ia5e7c53d35d8178dd2c75708698599fe8bded5de Signed-off-by: Rinku Kothiya <rkothiya@redhat.com>
The current implementation of iobuf_pool has two problems: - prealloc of 12.5MB memory, this limits the scale factor of the gluster processes due to RAM requirements - lock contention, as the current implementation has one global iobuf_pool lock. Credits for debugging and addressing the same goes to Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com>. Issue: #410 Hence changing the iobuf implementation to use per thread mem pool. This may theoritically appear to cause perf dip as there is no preallocation. But per thread mem pool will not have significant perf impact as the last allocated memory is kept alive for subsequent allocs, for some time. The worst case would be if iobufs requested are of random sizes each time. The best case is, if we get iobuf request of the same size. From the perf tests, this patch did not seem to cause any perf decrease. Note that, with this patch, the rdma performance is going to degrade drastically. In one of the previous patchsets we had fixes to not degrade rdma perf, but rdma is not supported and also not tested [1]. Hence the decision was to not have code in rdma that is not tested and not supported. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users.old/2018-July/034400.html Updates: #325 Change-Id: Ic2ef3bd498f9250dea25f25ba0c01fde19584b27 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com>
libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in general out of tree devel package usage. Towards this, the following changes are done, - moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory - Included these headers using system header notation <> in all code outside of libglusterfs - Included these headers using own program notation "" within libglusterfs This change although big, is just moving around the headers and making it correct when including these headers from other sources. This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without namespace conflicts. Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b Updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Make an effort to slightly better align the structures. Change-Id: I6f80a451f2ffbf15adfb986cedc24c2799787b49 updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>
Per newer GCC releases and clang-scan, some trivial dead initialization (values that were set but were never read) were removed. Compile-tested only! updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> Change-Id: Ia9959b2ff87d2e9cb46864e68ffe7dccb984db34
Fixes CID: 1382442 1382415 1382379 1382355 Change-Id: Ia712e37cb5a6db452d3178386394f87f83b85d38 updates: bz#789278 Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bgoyal@redhat.com>
Right now, if no option is provided, the default port is assumed, which is 24007. Ideally, for 'glusterfsd' processes, it is better to not assume there are any ports given, so it can start listening on any port which is available. This helps us to cleanup the dependencies on glusterd from glusterfsd at the moment. No changes would be done to glusterd code, but making the right defaults helps to make glusterfsd more independent process later. NOTE: This patch is a reduced version of below set of patches: * https://review.gluster.org/14613/ & * https://review.gluster.org/14670/ & * https://review.gluster.org/14671/ Credits: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <pkalever@redhat.com> updates: bz#1343926 Change-Id: Ib874e10505e7366dc56ba754458252b67052e653 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>