diff options
author | Vikas Gorur <vikas@zresearch.com> | 2009-02-18 17:36:07 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vikas Gorur <vikas@zresearch.com> | 2009-02-18 17:36:07 +0530 |
commit | 77adf4cd648dce41f89469dd185deec6b6b53a0b (patch) | |
tree | 02e155a5753b398ee572b45793f889b538efab6b /doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt | |
parent | f3b2e6580e5663292ee113c741343c8a43ee133f (diff) |
Added all files
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt b/doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..498e95480ae --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/hacker-guide/write-behind.txt @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +basic working +-------------- + + write behind is basically a translator to lie to the application that the write-requests are finished, even before it is actually finished. + + on a regular translator tree without write-behind, control flow is like this: + + 1. application makes a write() system call. + 2. VFS ==> FUSE ==> /dev/fuse. + 3. fuse-bridge initiates a glusterfs writev() call. + 4. writev() is STACK_WIND()ed upto client-protocol or storage translator. + 5. client-protocol, on recieving reply from server, starts STACK_UNWIND() towards the fuse-bridge. + + on a translator tree with write-behind, control flow is like this: + + 1. application makes a write() system call. + 2. VFS ==> FUSE ==> /dev/fuse. + 3. fuse-bridge initiates a glusterfs writev() call. + 4. writev() is STACK_WIND()ed upto write-behind translator. + 5. write-behind adds the write buffer to its internal queue and does a STACK_UNWIND() towards the fuse-bridge. + + write call is completed in application's percepective. after STACK_UNWIND()ing towards the fuse-bridge, write-behind initiates a fresh writev() call to its child translator, whose replies will be consumed by write-behind itself. write-behind _doesn't_ cache the write buffer, unless 'option flush-behind on' is specified in volume specification file. + +windowing +--------- + + write respect to write-behind, each write-buffer has three flags: 'stack_wound', 'write_behind' and 'got_reply'. + + stack_wound: if set, indicates that write-behind has initiated STACK_WIND() towards child translator. + + write_behind: if set, indicates that write-behind has done STACK_UNWIND() towards fuse-bridge. + + got_reply: if set, indicates that write-behind has recieved reply from child translator for a writev() STACK_WIND(). a request will be destroyed by write-behind only if this flag is set. + + currently pending write requests = aggregate size of requests with write_behind = 1 and got_reply = 0. + + window size limits the aggregate size of currently pending write requests. once the pending requests' size has reached the window size, write-behind blocks writev() calls from fuse-bridge. + blocking is only from application's perspective. write-behind does STACK_WIND() to child translator straight-away, but hold behind the STACK_UNWIND() towards fuse-bridge. STACK_UNWIND() is done only once write-behind gets enough replies to accomodate for currently blocked request. + +flush behind +------------ + + if 'option flush-behind on' is specified in volume specification file, then write-behind sends aggregate write requests to child translator, instead of regular per request STACK_WIND()s. + + |