libglusterfs: Move devel headers under glusterfs directory

libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using
include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better
especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in
general out of tree devel package usage.

Towards this, the following changes are done,
- moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory
- Included these headers using system header notation <> in all
code outside of libglusterfs
- Included these headers using own program notation "" within
libglusterfs

This change although big, is just moving around the headers and
making it correct when including these headers from other sources.

This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without
namespace conflicts.

Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b
Updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/libglusterfs/src/glusterfs/locking.h b/libglusterfs/src/glusterfs/locking.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43cc87735d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libglusterfs/src/glusterfs/locking.h
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+  Copyright (c) 2008-2012 Red Hat, Inc. <http://www.redhat.com>
+  This file is part of GlusterFS.
+
+  This file is licensed to you under your choice of the GNU Lesser
+  General Public License, version 3 or any later version (LGPLv3 or
+  later), or the GNU General Public License, version 2 (GPLv2), in all
+  cases as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+*/
+
+#ifndef _LOCKING_H
+#define _LOCKING_H
+
+#include <pthread.h>
+
+#if defined(GF_DARWIN_HOST_OS)
+#include <libkern/OSAtomic.h>
+#define pthread_spinlock_t OSSpinLock
+#define pthread_spin_lock(l) OSSpinLockLock(l)
+#define pthread_spin_unlock(l) OSSpinLockUnlock(l)
+#define pthread_spin_destroy(l) 0
+#define pthread_spin_init(l, v) (*l = v)
+#endif
+
+#if defined(HAVE_SPINLOCK)
+
+typedef union {
+    pthread_spinlock_t spinlock;
+    pthread_mutex_t mutex;
+} gf_lock_t;
+
+#if !defined(LOCKING_IMPL)
+extern int use_spinlocks;
+
+/*
+ * Using a dispatch table would be unpleasant because we're dealing with two
+ * different types.  If the dispatch contains direct pointers to pthread_xx
+ * or mutex_xxx then we have to hope that every possible union alternative
+ * starts at the same address as the union itself.  I'm old enough to remember
+ * compilers where this was not the case (for alignment reasons) so I'm a bit
+ * paranoid about that.  Also, I don't like casting arguments through "void *"
+ * which we'd also have to do to avoid type errors.  The other alternative would
+ * be to define actual functions which pick out the right union member, and put
+ * those in the dispatch tables.  Now we have a pointer dereference through the
+ * dispatch table plus a function call, which is likely to be worse than the
+ * branching here from the ?: construct.  If it were a clear win it might be
+ * worth the extra complexity, but for now this way seems preferable.
+ */
+
+#define LOCK_INIT(x)                                                           \
+    (use_spinlocks ? pthread_spin_init(&((x)->spinlock), 0)                    \
+                   : pthread_mutex_init(&((x)->mutex), 0))
+
+#define LOCK(x)                                                                \
+    (use_spinlocks ? pthread_spin_lock(&((x)->spinlock))                       \
+                   : pthread_mutex_lock(&((x)->mutex)))
+
+#define TRY_LOCK(x)                                                            \
+    (use_spinlocks ? pthread_spin_trylock(&((x)->spinlock))                    \
+                   : pthread_mutex_trylock(&((x)->mutex)))
+
+#define UNLOCK(x)                                                              \
+    (use_spinlocks ? pthread_spin_unlock(&((x)->spinlock))                     \
+                   : pthread_mutex_unlock(&((x)->mutex)))
+
+#define LOCK_DESTROY(x)                                                        \
+    (use_spinlocks ? pthread_spin_destroy(&((x)->spinlock))                    \
+                   : pthread_mutex_destroy(&((x)->mutex)))
+
+#endif
+
+#else
+
+typedef pthread_mutex_t gf_lock_t;
+
+#define LOCK_INIT(x) pthread_mutex_init(x, 0)
+#define LOCK(x) pthread_mutex_lock(x)
+#define TRY_LOCK(x) pthread_mutex_trylock(x)
+#define UNLOCK(x) pthread_mutex_unlock(x)
+#define LOCK_DESTROY(x) pthread_mutex_destroy(x)
+
+#endif /* HAVE_SPINLOCK */
+
+#endif /* _LOCKING_H */