every/where: add GF_FOP_IPC for inter-translator communication

Several features - e.g. encryption, erasure codes, or NSR - involve
multiple cooperating translators which sometimes need a "private" means
of communication amongst themselves.  Historically we've used virtual or
synthetic xattrs, but that's not very elegant and clutters up the
getxattr/setxattr path which must also handle real xattr requests.  This
new fop should address that.

The only argument is an int32_t "op" which should be recognized by the
target translator.  It is recommended that translators using these
feature follow some convention regarding the ops that they define, to
avoid conflicts.  Using a hash of the target translator's type string as
a base for a series of ops would probably be a good start.  Any other
information can be passed in both directions using xdata.

The default behavior for this fop, as with any other, is to pass through
to FIRST_CHILD.  That makes use of this fop "transparent" to other
translators that were written before it existed, but it also means that
it only really works with pass-through translators.  If a routing
translator (such as DHT) or a fan-out translator (such as AFR) is
involved, the IPC might not reach its intended destination unless those
translators are modified to forward IPC fops along all paths.

If an IPC gets all the way to storage/posix it is considered an error,
much like an uncaught exception.  We don't actually *do* anything in
that case, but we do log it send back an EOPNOTSUPP error.  This makes
the "unrecognized opcode" condition distinguishable from the "no IPC
support" condition (which would yield an RPC error instead) so clients
can probe for the presence of a handler for their own favorite opcode
and either use that or use old-school xattrs depending on the result.

BUG: 1158628
Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Change-Id: I84af1b17babe5b30ec03ecf027ae37d09b873968
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8812
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/libglusterfs/src/syncop.c b/libglusterfs/src/syncop.c
index 9df462321aa..e3321cf6ddb 100644
--- a/libglusterfs/src/syncop.c
+++ b/libglusterfs/src/syncop.c
@@ -2417,6 +2417,52 @@ syncop_zerofill(xlator_t *subvol, fd_t *fd, off_t offset, off_t len)
 
 
 int
+syncop_ipc_cbk (call_frame_t *frame, void *cookie, xlator_t *this,
+                int op_ret, int op_errno, dict_t *xdata)
+{
+        struct syncargs *args = NULL;
+
+        args = cookie;
+
+        if (xdata) {
+                args->xdata = dict_ref(xdata);
+        }
+
+        args->op_ret   = op_ret;
+        args->op_errno = op_errno;
+
+        __wake (args);
+
+        return 0;
+}
+
+int
+syncop_ipc (xlator_t *subvol, int32_t op, dict_t *xdata_in, dict_t **xdata_out)
+{
+        struct syncargs args = {0, };
+
+        SYNCOP (subvol, (&args), syncop_ipc_cbk, subvol->fops->ipc,
+                op, xdata_in);
+
+        if (args.xdata) {
+                if (xdata_out) {
+                        /*
+                         * We're passing this reference to the caller, along
+                         * with the pointer itself.  That means they're
+                         * responsible for calling dict_unref at some point.
+                         */
+                        *xdata_out = args.xdata;
+                } else {
+                        dict_unref(args.xdata);
+                }
+        }
+
+        if (args.op_ret < 0)
+                return -args.op_errno;
+        return args.op_ret;
+}
+
+int
 syncop_lk_cbk (call_frame_t *frame, void *cookie, xlator_t *this,
 	       int op_ret, int op_errno, struct gf_flock *flock,
 	       dict_t *xdata)