summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga@redhat.com>2015-08-05 19:20:04 +0530
committerDan Lambright <dlambrig@redhat.com>2015-08-13 07:32:25 -0700
commit0ad26041fbf65ab36856a0ad178c32e51bf87319 (patch)
treebf705bd12d8acb70a7876ecd19b01c37b875b005 /rpc
parent6e055b7d7355cadbbf559ad4bed23872aa1743df (diff)
dht/tier :rename fails with EBUSY
When the files was in hot tier and the look up was done already, then hashed and cached subvolume will be hot-tier. Once the file is moved from hot-tier to cold-tier, then subsequent lookup will send a revalidate lookup to hot-tier and it will find out that the file was actually moved and there is only link in the cached subvolume. So dht will return an ESTALE to fuse. Upon receiving ESTALE for a lookup, fuse will create a new inode and sent a fresh lookup. This lookup will be successful, and it will locate the file properly. Then fuse try to link the inode, but the older inode was already there in inmemory inode cache with same gfid and that is also shared with fuse kernal. So inode_link will return the older ionode itself. So the subsequent rename fop will come to gluster with the older inode. From dht_rename, we will take a lock on the inode and after successful inodelk on inode dht will send lookup before creating a link. this lookup will again find out that the file is a link file, and then dht will think that file is migrating/migrated in the mean time, and will send EBUSY. Change-Id: Ib3a01e5b1d7f64514b04bb6234026d049f082679 BUG: 1248306 Signed-off-by: Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11768 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Lambright <dlambrig@redhat.com> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Tested-by: Dan Lambright <dlambrig@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'rpc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions