diff options
author | Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com> | 2014-10-09 17:32:48 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com> | 2014-10-28 00:08:10 -0700 |
commit | 1fa3e87db77bb379173723a5e75b361a8e192f09 (patch) | |
tree | 0001e771a1693a078680ead5ebd1cf053d349872 /tests/basic/uss.t | |
parent | 2855dff243f20a78cd8cc4e7cd581a9c558b2e69 (diff) |
features/snapview-server: check if the reference to the snapshot world is
correct before doing any fop
The following operations might lead to problems:
* Create a file on the glusterfs mount point
* Create a snapshot (say "snap1")
* Access the contents of the snapshot
* Delete the file from the mount point
* Delete the snapshot "snap1"
* Create a new snapshot "snap1"
Now accessing the new snapshot "snap1" gives problems. Because the inode and
dentry created for snap1 would not be deleted upon the deletion of the snapshot
(as deletion of snapshot is a gluster cli operation, not a fop). So next time
upon creation of a new snap with same name, the previous inode and dentry itself
will be used. But the inode context contains old information about the glfs_t
instance and the handle in the gfapi world. Directly accessing them without
proper check leads to ENOTCONN errors. Thus the glfs_t instance should be
checked before accessing. If its wrong, then right instance should be obtained
by doing the lookup.
Change-Id: Idca0c8015ff632447cea206a4807d8ef968424fa
BUG: 1151004
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8917
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/basic/uss.t')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/basic/uss.t | 36 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/basic/uss.t b/tests/basic/uss.t index 04d4baf64a5..2ce78bb682b 100644 --- a/tests/basic/uss.t +++ b/tests/basic/uss.t @@ -274,4 +274,40 @@ function count_snaps EXPECT_WITHIN 30 "5" count_snaps $M0; +# deletion of a snapshot and creation of a new snapshot with same name +# should not create problems. The data that was supposed to be present +# in the deleted snapshot need not be present in the new snapshot just +# because the name is same. Ex: +# 1) Create a file "aaa" +# 2) Create a snapshot snap6 +# 3) stat the file "aaa" in snap6 and it should succeed +# 4) delete the file "aaa" +# 5) Delete the snapshot snap6 +# 6) Create a snapshot snap6 +# 7) stat the file "aaa" in snap6 and it should fail now + +echo "aaa" > $M0/aaa; + +TEST $CLI snapshot create snap6 $V0 + +TEST ls $M0/.history; + +EXPECT_WITHIN 30 "6" count_snaps $M0; + +TEST stat $M0/.history/snap6/aaa + +TEST rm -f $M0/aaa; + +TEST $CLI snapshot delete snap6; + +TEST $CLI snapshot create snap6 $V0 + +TEST ls $M0/.history; + +EXPECT_WITHIN 30 "6" count_snaps $M0; + +TEST ls $M0/.history/snap6/; + +TEST ! stat $M0/.history/snap6/aaa; + cleanup; |