diff options
author | Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com> | 2014-12-31 15:15:53 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com> | 2015-01-04 19:51:43 -0800 |
commit | f30af2735cab7475d86665856b433ca409e79ee7 (patch) | |
tree | 36dfbfcc147a098de12e52d154d3b27bdcc5a2da /tests/bugs/bug-1090042.t | |
parent | 2ddd3b2f2bdd6b2046edb0af1e3685dff866ddf6 (diff) |
cluster/afr: serialize inode locks
Problem:
Afr winds inodelk calls without any order, so blocking inodelks
from two different mounts can lead to dead lock when mount1 gets
the lock on brick-1 and blocked on brick-2 where as mount2 gets
lock on brick-2 and blocked on brick-1
Fix:
Serialize the inodelks whether they are blocking inodelks or
non-blocking inodelks.
Non-blocking locks also need to be serialized.
Otherwise there is a chance that both the mounts which issued same
non-blocking inodelk may endup not acquiring the lock on any-brick.
Ex:
Mount1 and Mount2 request for full length lock on file f1. Mount1 afr may
acquire the partial lock on brick-1 and may not acquire the lock on brick-2
because Mount2 already got the lock on brick-2, vice versa. Since both the
mounts only got partial locks, afr treats them as failure in gaining the locks
and unwinds with EAGAIN errno.
Change-Id: Ie6cc3d564638ab3aad586f9a4064d81e42d52aef
BUG: 1176008
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9372
Reviewed-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bugs/bug-1090042.t')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions