diff options
author | Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com> | 2014-04-24 16:37:05 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com> | 2014-04-26 00:52:25 -0700 |
commit | 6a188c6b2c95d16c1bb6391c9fcb8ef808c2141b (patch) | |
tree | 4af0e88cae2d1a7807b647c59e930bc4678aa9ed /xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c | |
parent | 0af287791f0d50b5d2975cb2e2c902c797b05860 (diff) |
features/locks: Remove stale entrylk objects from 'blocked_locks' list
* In the event of a DISCONNECT from a client, as part of cleanup,
entrylk objects are not removed from the blocked_locks list before
being unref'd and freed, causing the brick process to crash at
some point when the (now) stale object is accessed again in the list.
* Also during cleanup, it is pointless to try and grant lock to a
previously blocked entrylk (say L1) as part of releasing another
conflicting lock (L2), (which is a side-effect of L1 not being
deleted from blocked_locks list before grant_blocked_entry_locks()
in cleanup) if L1 is also associated with the DISCONNECTing client.
This patch fixes the problem.
Change-Id: I3d684c6bafc7e6db89ba68f0a2ed1dcb333791c6
BUG: 1089470
Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/7560
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c')
-rw-r--r-- | xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c | 50 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c b/xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c index 4f5d8aca2c6..8496d9d8dce 100644 --- a/xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c +++ b/xlators/features/locks/src/entrylk.c @@ -715,15 +715,16 @@ pl_entrylk_client_cleanup (xlator_t *this, pl_ctx_t *ctx) pl_inode_t *pinode = NULL; struct list_head released; + struct list_head unwind; INIT_LIST_HEAD (&released); + INIT_LIST_HEAD (&unwind); pthread_mutex_lock (&ctx->lock); { list_for_each_entry_safe (l, tmp, &ctx->entrylk_lockers, client_list) { list_del_init (&l->client_list); - list_add_tail (&l->client_list, &released); pl_entrylk_log_cleanup (l); @@ -731,19 +732,62 @@ pl_entrylk_client_cleanup (xlator_t *this, pl_ctx_t *ctx) pthread_mutex_lock (&pinode->mutex); { - list_del_init (&l->domain_list); + /* If the entrylk object is part of granted list but not + * blocked list, then perform the following actions: + * i. delete the object from granted list; + * ii. grant other locks (from other clients) that may + * have been blocked on this entrylk; and + * iii. unref the object. + * + * If the entrylk object (L1) is part of both granted + * and blocked lists, then this means that a parallel + * unlock on another entrylk (L2 say) may have 'granted' + * L1 and added it to 'granted' list in + * __grant_blocked_entry_locks() (although using the + * 'blocked_locks' member). In that case, the cleanup + * codepath must try and grant other overlapping + * blocked entrylks from other clients, now that L1 is + * out of their way and then unref L1 in the end, and + * leave it to the other thread (the one executing + * unlock codepath) to unwind L1's frame, delete it from + * blocked_locks list, and perform the last unref on L1. + * + * If the entrylk object (L1) is part of blocked list + * only, the cleanup code path must: + * i. delete it from the blocked_locks list inside + * this critical section, + * ii. unwind its frame with EAGAIN, + * iii. try and grant blocked entry locks from other + * clients that were otherwise grantable, but were + * blocked to avoid leaving L1 to starve forever. + * iv. unref the object. + */ + if (!list_empty (&l->domain_list)) { + list_del_init (&l->domain_list); + list_add_tail (&l->client_list, + &released); + } else { + list_del_init (&l->blocked_locks); + list_add_tail (&l->client_list, + &unwind); + } } pthread_mutex_unlock (&pinode->mutex); } } pthread_mutex_unlock (&ctx->lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe (l, tmp, &released, client_list) { + list_for_each_entry_safe (l, tmp, &unwind, client_list) { list_del_init (&l->client_list); if (l->frame) STACK_UNWIND_STRICT (entrylk, l->frame, -1, EAGAIN, NULL); + list_add_tail (&l->client_list, &released); + } + + list_for_each_entry_safe (l, tmp, &released, client_list) { + list_del_init (&l->client_list); pinode = l->pinode; |