summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/xlators/performance/io-threads/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShehjar Tikoo <shehjart@zresearch.com>2009-04-01 14:00:36 -0700
committerAnand V. Avati <avati@amp.gluster.com>2009-04-02 19:19:25 +0530
commitb1bbd77f16a13f8109d1e2e1b4ed869db1e86645 (patch)
tree113ae9263b5769244cdc926c7a043504cec6849f /xlators/performance/io-threads/src
parentae53812b2ccfd7842fa6430081465ed90f18814b (diff)
io-threads: Cleanup request queueing,thread firing
Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati <avati@amp.gluster.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'xlators/performance/io-threads/src')
-rw-r--r--xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c68
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c b/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
index fbd002267f3..31d86f5e7c1 100644
--- a/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
+++ b/xlators/performance/io-threads/src/io-threads.c
@@ -40,6 +40,31 @@ void iot_startup_workers (iot_worker_t **workers, int start_idx, int count,
iot_worker_fn workerfunc);
void * iot_worker_unordered (void *arg);
void * iot_worker_ordered (void *arg);
+void iot_startup_worker (iot_worker_t *worker, iot_worker_fn workerfunc);
+
+/* I know this function modularizes things a bit too much,
+ * but it is easier on the eyes to read this than see all that locking,
+ * queueing, and thread firing in the same curly block, as was the
+ * case before this function.
+ */
+void
+iot_request_queue_and_thread_fire (iot_worker_t *worker,
+ iot_worker_fn workerfunc,
+ iot_request_t *req)
+{
+ pthread_mutex_lock (&worker->qlock);
+ {
+ if (iot_worker_active (worker))
+ _iot_queue (worker, req);
+ else {
+ iot_startup_worker (worker, workerfunc);
+ _iot_queue (worker, req);
+ }
+ }
+ pthread_mutex_unlock (&worker->qlock);
+}
+
+
int
iot_unordered_request_balancer (iot_conf_t *conf)
@@ -78,20 +103,8 @@ iot_schedule_unordered (iot_conf_t *conf,
selected_worker = conf->uworkers[idx];
req = iot_init_request (stub);
- /* Having decided that, we must check whether the thread is
- * active at all.
- */
- pthread_mutex_lock (&selected_worker->qlock);
- {
- if (iot_worker_active (selected_worker))
- _iot_queue (selected_worker, req);
- else {
- iot_startup_workers (conf->uworkers, idx, 1,
- iot_worker_unordered);
- _iot_queue (selected_worker, req);
- }
- }
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&selected_worker->qlock);
+ iot_request_queue_and_thread_fire (selected_worker,
+ iot_worker_unordered, req);
}
/* Assumes inode lock is held. */
@@ -146,17 +159,8 @@ iot_schedule_ordered (iot_conf_t *conf,
* added the request to the worker queue.
*/
selected_worker = conf->oworkers[idx];
- pthread_mutex_lock (&selected_worker->qlock);
- {
- if (iot_worker_active (selected_worker))
- _iot_queue (selected_worker, req);
- else {
- iot_startup_workers (conf->oworkers, idx, 1,
- iot_worker_ordered);
- _iot_queue (selected_worker, req);
- }
- }
- pthread_mutex_unlock (&selected_worker->qlock);
+ iot_request_queue_and_thread_fire (selected_worker,
+ iot_worker_ordered, req);
}
UNLOCK (&inode->lock);
}
@@ -1731,6 +1735,13 @@ allocate_workers (iot_conf_t *conf,
}
}
+void
+iot_startup_worker (iot_worker_t *worker, iot_worker_fn workerfunc)
+{
+ worker->state = IOT_STATE_ACTIVE;
+ pthread_create (&worker->thread, NULL, workerfunc, worker);
+}
+
void
iot_startup_workers (iot_worker_t **workers, int start_idx, int count,
@@ -1740,11 +1751,8 @@ iot_startup_workers (iot_worker_t **workers, int start_idx, int count,
int end_idx = 0;
end_idx = start_idx + count;
- for (i = start_idx; i < end_idx; i++) {
- workers[i]->state = IOT_STATE_ACTIVE;
- pthread_create (&workers[i]->thread, NULL, workerfunc,
- workers[i]);
- }
+ for (i = start_idx; i < end_idx; i++)
+ iot_startup_worker (workers[i], workerfunc);
}