| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I6e78477554097a2be5aad8e3fb196970fb30dac2
Signed-off-by: Justin Clift <justin@gluster.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10203
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The subject of a patch should not end with a dot (.). It is not common
to have subjects of emails end with a dot, and neither is it common for
patches.
Change-Id: Id090241393aee3ca99df4887bdb2d7a7a8913164
BUG: 1198849
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9940
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Cooper <ira@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
README is called README.md in git HEAD, and we have a directory
heal.
Change-Id: I2e698b95c6924b5b21aa54257fefd6a6698255ee
BUG: 1198849
Signed-off-by: Michael Scherer <misc@zarb.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9784
Reviewed-by: Humble Devassy Chirammal <humble.devassy@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 0a8371bdfdd88e662d09def717cc0b822feb64e8.
Change-Id: I946f449ad213cea70fbbd9cd3951f5838b9f82e5
BUG: 1120646
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8927
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The two-line form "}\nelse {" has been more common than the one-line
form "} else {" in our code for years, and IMO for good reason (see
the comment in the diff).
Change-Id: Ic22c76fe76f0d91300daff36e755a18a8db58852
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8888
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically:
* space before function arguments
* brace around single statement
Ideally we would *reverse* these tests so they warn under the exact
opposite conditions, but that would mean learning the internals of a
script written in a defective language with cryptic variable names and
too few comments. Life's too short. For now, just cutting down on some
of the spam (which might obscure more serious issues) should suffice.
BUG: 1120646
Change-Id: I5ec684d0d788a34f29af9b1761743c8860973993
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8813
Reviewed-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Tested-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Allow 'quoted string split across lines' since its a
GlusterFS common practice
- Remove a useless "+" - perl 5.20 complains with following
warning "Useless use of greediness modifier '+'"
Change-Id: Ibaf276ec84757b3ecc3e6db7f5e720b8e8a12dff
BUG: 1120646
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8811
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
|
|
This is to bring in adherence to coding policy, prior to patch
submission for review.
- no tabs
- no whitespace
- indentation (linux style) etc.
This is in the interest at large for the GlusterFS codebase
to be more cleaner and readable.
./rfc.sh - now supports running this for all patches diverged
from "origin/master" revision.
NOTE: One should take this as a handle for good guidelines and
never use it as a tool for correctness, use common-sense in all
the cases ;-)
Change-Id: Ib9a5ed207cde152cb92b8d38cec83e8ce9ef7f28
BUG: 1120646
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8181
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
|