| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem : When gluster volume remove-brick is executed with out any option, it
defaults to force commit which results in data loss.
Fix : remove-brick can not be executed with out explicit option, user needs to
provide the option in the command line else the command will throw back an usage
error.
Earlier usage : volume remove-brick <VOLNAME> [replica <COUNT>] <BRICK> ...
[start|stop|status|commit|force]
Current usage : volume remove-brick <VOLNAME> [replica <COUNT>] <BRICK> ...
<start|stop|status|commit|force>
Change-Id: I2a49131f782a6c0dcd03b4dc8ebe5907999b0b49
BUG: 1077682
Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/7292
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <sam.somari@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some tests do not cleanup after themselves. That is bad behaviour and
makes it difficult to run single tests and verify the state of the
system afterwards.
Change-Id: I4ac5401d790d6bc81e6975fd1384874b21d6cf8a
BUG: 983975
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/5328
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
|
|
remove-brick start doesn't remove the brick from the volume immediately.
It would wait until migration of data to other bricks are complete. Even
when there is no data to be migrated, one can expect a finite delay from
the time of remove-brick start command's exit and removal of brick(s).
This may cause subsequent checks on brick count to fail in a
non-deterministic manner.
Also, renamed the test file name to reflect bug-id corresponding to
community release.
Change-Id: Ic43f011e251640decb68e46f4a10e0824ade0ac9
BUG: 878004
Signed-off-by: Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4885
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
|