| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Use 'getfattr' properly avoid redundant options during xattr query
- Untabify certain parts of tests (remove tabs)
- Avoid backtick evaluation for certain values to make code more portable.
- Use awk on FreeBSD/Darwin, since 'wc' implementation is broken and adds
spurious spaces in its output.
Change-Id: I7dcc0b70874e43b4cda8c306ed18a31b7a3f990a
BUG: 1131713
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8520
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
Tested-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I479ab941b3b2da3b16f624400fbd300f08326268
BUG: 1092850
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/7799
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
|
|
|
This is necessary to support "DHT over DHT" configurations, so that the
upper and lower instances of DHT don't step all over each other. Why
would we even consider such a thing? Because it gives us the ability to
do data tiering and rack-aware placement, either by themselves or as
complements to other functionality such as erasure codes or
deduplication which save space but cost performance. By setting up the
top-level DHT to place data into one of several lower-level DHT pools
based on policy instead of pure elastic hashing, we get better
performance for 90% of accesses and better storage efficiency for 90% of
data, all for relatively low effort.
Change-Id: I72e65c29edfc80babf39f7a2a00090f4588c4070
BUG: 924265
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4694
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
|
