summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/bugs/gfapi
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* tests/gfapi : add test case for nameless lookups in glfs_resolve_component()Jiffin Tony Thottan2017-08-022-0/+169
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Plus address pending comment to add check for entry "" in glfs_resolve_component() Change-Id: I6063f776ce1cd76cb4c1b1f621b064f3dcc91e5c BUG: 1460514 Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17844 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: soumya k <skoduri@redhat.com>
* tests/gfapi:Adding testcase to check handling of "." and ".."Mohammed Rafi KC2017-05-122-0/+165
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adding a testcase to check the proper handling of "." and ".." in gfapi path. The patch which fix the issue is https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17177 Change-Id: I5c9cceade30f7d8a3b451b5f34f1cf9815729c4a BUG: 1447266 Signed-off-by: Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17216 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jeff@pl.atyp.us> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
* gfapi: Mark tests/basic/gfapi/1093594.t bad until it is fixedPoornima G2016-08-301-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | Change-Id: If88efe3db782a6156614af4c650d53b159ade57f BUG: 1371541 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15354 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
* tests: Enable all gfapi test casesPoornima G2016-07-207-0/+712
| | | | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I32bfec4af91348d96dc3e81a9d5c9cad599f821b Bug: 1358594 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14748 NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
* gfapi: Fix IO error caused when there is consecutive graph switchesPoornima G2016-06-162-335/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Issue: Consider a simple situation, where glfs_init() is done, i.e. initial graph is up. Now perform 2 volume sets that results in 2 client side graph changes. After this perform some IO, the IO fails with ENOTCON. The only way to recover this client is i guess another graph switch or restart. What actually is happening from code perspective: Initial graph lets say A, followed by 2 consecutive graph switches to B and C without any IO those two switches. - graph_setup (A) as a result of GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP, and fs->next_subvol = A - glfs_init() results in fs->active_subvol = A, fs->next_subvol = NULL - graph_setup (B) as a result of GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP, and fs->next_subvol = B - graph_setup (C) as a result of GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP, and fs->next_subvol = C. It also sees that the previous graph B was never set as fs->active_subvol, i.e. no IO or anything happened on B, so can safely send GF_EVENT_PARENT_DOWN (by calling glfs_subvol_done(B)). This parent down on B, results in child_down(B), which is fine. But child_down also triggers graph_setup(B). - graph_setup(B) as a result of GF_EVENT_CHILD_DOWN, and fs->next_subvol = B, and GF_EVENT_PARENT_DOWN on C as explained above. This again leads to GF_EVENT_CHILD_DOWN on C. - graph_setup(C) as a result of GF_EVENT_CHILD_DOWN, and fs->next_subvol = C, and GF_EVENT_PARENT_DOWN on B as explained above. Thus both the graphs B and C are disconnected, and hence the ENOTCON Solution: Remove the call to graph_setup() when the event is GF_EVENT_CHILD_DOWN. It don't see any reason why graph_setup should be called when there is child_down. Not sure what the original reason was, to have graph_setup in child_down. git hostory shows the first patch itself had this call. Change-Id: I9de86555f66cc94a05649ac863b40ed3426ffd4b BUG: 1343038 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14656 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
* tests: move libgfapi tests to their own gfapi subdirNiels de Vos2015-03-232-0/+335
Also, glfs_fini() is currently not stable yet, this test case causes many regression failures. The .t file has been renamed to .sh so that the test does not get run automatically, but can be run easily by hand. BUG: 1093594 Change-Id: I63fa4ddf798a505bc94d13d32dd02f22a9b7ab73 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9961 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com> Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana@redhat.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-11-15 06:20:04 +0000