| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
1) Afr's eager-lock only works for data transactions.
2) When there are conflicting writes, write with conflicting region initiates
unlock of eager-lock leading to extra pre-ops and post-ops on the file. When
eager-lock goes off, it leads to extra fsyncs for random-write workload in afr.
Solution (that is modeled after EC):
In EC, when there is a conflicting write, it waits for the current write to
complete before it winds the conflicted write. This leads to better utilization
of network and disk, because we will not be doing extra xattrops and FSYNCs and
inodelk/unlock. Moved fd based counters to inode based counters.
I tried to model the solution based on EC's locking, but it is not similar to
AFR because we had to keep backward compatibility.
Lifecycle of lock:
==================
First transaction is added to inode->owners list and an inodelk will be sent on
the wire. All the next transactions will be put in inode->waiters list until
the first transaction completes inodelk and [f]xattrop completely. Once
[f]xattrop also completes, all the requests in the inode->waiters list are
checked if it conflict with any of the existing locks which are in
inode->owners list and if not are added to inode->owners list and resumed with
doing transaction. When these transactions complete fop phase they will be
moved to inode->post_op list and resume the transactions that were paused
because of conflicts. Post-op and unlock will not be issued on the wire until
that is the last transaction on that inode. Last transaction when it has to
perform post-op can choose to sleep for deyed-post-op-secs value. During that
time if any other transaction comes, it will wake up the sleeping transaction
and takes over the ownership of the lock and the cycle continues. If the
dealyed-post-op-secs expire, then the timer thread will wakeup the sleeping
transaction and it will set lock->release to true and starts doing post-op and
then unlock. During this time if any other transactions come, they will be put
in inode->frozen list. Once the previous unlock comes it will move the frozen
list to waiters list and moves the first element from this waiters-list to
owners-list and attempts the lock and the cycle continues. This is the general
idea. There is logic at the time of dealying and at the time of new
transaction or in flush fop to wakeup existing sleeping transactions or
choosing whether to delay a transaction etc, which is subjected to change based
on future enhancements etc.
Fixes: #418
BUG: 1549606
Change-Id: I88b570bbcf332a27c82d2767dfa82472f60055dc
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Next step in eventual deprecation of glusterfs nfs server in favor
of ganesha.nfsd.
Also replace several open-coded strings with constant.
Change-Id: If52f5e880191a14fd38e69b70a32b0300dd93a50
BUG: 1092414
Signed-off-by: Kaleb S KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13738
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem: If a fop takes lock, and completes its operation,
it waits for 1 second before releasing the lock. However,
If ec find any lock contention within this time period,
it release the lock immediately before time expires. As we
take lock on first brick, for few operations, like read, it
might happen that discovery of lock contention might take
long time and can degrades the performance.
Solution: Provide an option to enable/disable eager lock.
If eager lock is disabled, lock will be released as soon
as fop completes.
gluster v set <VOLUME NAME> disperse.eager-lock on
gluster v set <VOLUME NAME> disperse.eager-lock off
Change-Id: I000985a787eba3c190fdcd5981dfbf04e64af166
BUG: 1314649
Signed-off-by: Ashish Pandey <aspandey@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13605
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
|
|
|
There are around 300 regression tests, 250 being in tests/bugs. Running
partial set of tests/bugs is not easy because this is a flat directory
with almost all tests inside.
It would be valuable to make partial test/bugs easier, and allow the use
of mulitple build hosts for a single commit, each running a subset of
the tests for a quicker result.
Additional changes made:
- correct the include path for *.rc shell libraries and *.py utils
- make the testcases pass checkpatch
- arequal-checksum in afr/self-heal.t was never executed, now it is
- include.rc now complains loudly if it fails to find env.rc
Change-Id: I26ffd067e9853d3be1fd63b2f37d8aa0fd1b4fea
BUG: 1178685
Reported-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
Reported-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@redhat.com>
URL: http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2014-December/043414.html
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9353
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
